"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/25/2016 at 20:19 • Filed to: None | 3 | 9 |
Lookin’ snazzy.
jkm7680
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/25/2016 at 20:28 | 3 |
It would look nicer if it had actual black bowties.
Shankems
> jkm7680
06/25/2016 at 20:38 | 6 |
You are not wrong.
jkm7680
> Shankems
06/25/2016 at 20:40 | 1 |
yisssssssssss
PS9
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/25/2016 at 20:50 | 1 |
What do you mean snazzy? It’s just a Malibu. A boring rental car with all the character of a[adds german badge], oh wait a minute! You didn’t tell me this thing was a luxury car! Man, what a sharp looking well designed piece of excellently built machinery. You know, I’ve been saying for years that every sedan would look better if it were designed like a business suit.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> PS9
06/25/2016 at 21:00 | 0 |
Glad to hear you like it.
DanZman
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/26/2016 at 01:13 | 1 |
I want one of these things so bad. I just don't need one and can't justify adding it to my stable.
nermal
> jkm7680
06/26/2016 at 09:18 | 2 |
They look a bazillion times better with black trim instead of all of that stupid chrome.
xyzabc
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/27/2016 at 14:44 | 2 |
This will be the car folks will rag on GM / Chevrolet for not building when they stop building it. Like the CTS-V Wagon....
P.V.B.
> PS9
06/30/2016 at 20:59 | 0 |
By “me”, I mean the SS, and therefore the Aussies.
The SS is in no way related to the car that has my mom (a previous owner of a ‘69 Chevelle Malibu w/ a 350 SBC & Muncie 4-on-the-floor) wanting to cunt-punt several people at GM for ruining the nameplate.